Posts Tagged badscience

Matthias Rath and Bad Science

I don’t think I’ve ever had the occasion to congratulate a newspaper – usually exactly the opposite. But for this I think the Guardian (and Ben Goldacre) deserve serious congratulations both for courage under fire and responsible journalism:

Matthias Rath drops his million pound legal case against me and the Guardian.

The Guardian article is also well worth reading for more on Matthias Rath, the vitamin campaigner: Fall of the doctor who said his vitamins would cure Aids.
Speaking of bad science, I was upset to hear the name Danie Krugel mentioned in a news report on the search for missing local girl Kerry Winter (Kerry recently went missing in Dubai in seriously dodgy circumstances, and has not yet been found). Danie Krugel is a charlatan of note and a South African embarrassment, famous for his “Matter Oriented System” or MOS which he claims can locate anything from missing people to diamonds and bacteria using “quantum physics, GPS Technology and DNA samples”. Despite being proved a fake time and time again, he keeps making it into the media. It wouldn’t be so upsetting if he didn’t give desperate people false hope.
Update: Subtle Shift in Emphasis has a great write-up on Danie Krugel, his voodoo science claims and his growing list of public failures. Also a growing list (and surrounding discussion) on the South African skeptics forum.

Tags: , ,

All time classic creationist pwnage

e-coli.jpgA classic Bad Science post which made me spill my tea when I reached the PPS:
All time classic creationist pwnage.
Andrew Schlafly (a “right wing christian activist”) is taken apart by Richard Lenski – a scientist with a sense of humour, a great writing style and some recent fame over lab results which appear to show evolution in action (i first heard about his results a few days ago via Slashdot).
The PPPS in Lenski’s reply mirrors my own puzzlement when it comes to Christians who refuse to believe in evolution:

“P.P.P.S. You may be unable to understand, or unwilling to accept, that evolution occurs. And yet, life evolves! [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_pur_si_muove] From the content on your website, it is clear that you, like many others, view God as the Creator of the Universe. I respect that view. I find it baffling, however, that someone can worship God as the all-mighty Creator while, at the same time, denying even the possibility (not to mention the overwhelming evidence) that God’s Creation involved evolution. It is as though a person thinks that God must have the same limitations when it comes to creation as a person who is unable to understand, or even attempt to understand, the world in which we live. Isn’t that view insulting to God?”
Richard Lenski

Tags: ,